/lit/ - Literature

>>12950111
This post and a couple of other posts I think are by the same anon always come to mind when I think about the future tasks of philosophy. Not sure I could explain exactly why I think it's important, but I do think this guy gets right that most "responses" to kantianism are just unwarranted lapses into pre-kantian thought. The problem he's talking about in the context of sciences is prevalent across most fields. Everyone's just doing remix philosophy and not trying to craft any new methodology to absorb past insights. At least imo