/lit/ - Literature

>>21937451
>he believes real life sheeps after Dolly are natural

>>21853828
Junger was a... a nigger?

>>21779312
>americans believe '"group of people" = society'

>>21617009
Are you, by any means, from the US, Mexico, Venezuela, or Congolombia?

>>21572146
>do not read books before the late medieval era
>in other words, read the greeks

>>21569009
>he claims that amphetamines didn't actually affect him physically, only psychichally and physically

>>21210776
>Where to start with him?
idk, i've only read his critiques on deleuze

>Is it really worth it
I think yes (but my opinion is based only in how little I've read him)

>he’s just an inferior version of Deluze idea-wise?
I don't think so. Badiou has another perspective and system. His critique is that he thinks Deleuze's 'virtual' is just another way of affirming the One-All ---which is not entirely false--- but, at the end, what he say is based on his own idea of the 'multiple', not on Deleuze's idea of 'multiplicity'.

Overall I think Badiou is worth reading if you still want to engage with dialectics (and its consequences), which Deleuze refuses. As a hint, if you want to pick either Deleuze or Badiou, you can make yourself an idea on this:

>Badiou <-- Hegel <-- Kant <-- Descartes <-- Plato + Set Theory
>Deleuze <-- Nietzsche <-- Kant <-- Spinoza + Differential Calculus (Bergson and Plato are optionals. Deleuze uses a lot of Bergson's ideas but overall he's more of a Nietzschean than a Bergsonian)

>>20956400
>another dicklet twitter accelerationism thread
sage

>>20915663
>https://adolfstalin.substack.com/p/why-cope-what-is-cope-deconstructionhtml
holy cringe

>>20663021
ilya prigogine, introduction to thermodynamics