/lit/ - Literature

>>16223539

"Cultural Marxism" doesn't exist, it's a /pol/tard strawman.
Marx's writings are simply a critique of labor under capitalism 90% of the time. He was not telling people to self-flagellate for the past crimes of their nations and cut their dicks off, he was just telling workers that they have different interests than capitalists like Jeff Bezos or Elon Musk within the sphere of production (and he was right, both of them are the typical example of rabid anti-union billionaires).

Leninists are all about "dude, dialectics says the USSR/China/Albania is the highest eternal stage of socialism, just wait until the state withers away lmao".
Stalin was actually against "degeneracy", and Nick Land wasn't totally wrong when he said:
>There’s a sizable constituency on the ‘alt right’ whose self-understood differentiation from the Marxist left is entirely reducible to its own heightened appreciation for authoritarian hierarchy and racial solidarity. Since actually existing Marxist-Leninist regimes have been, uniformly, authoritarian-hierarchical ethno-nationalists, this isn’t in fact the basis for any real difference at all.

The few movements that could be deemed as "Cultural Marxism" were the Frankfurt School and the Situationists. It's not what you think at all, pic related.
"Cultural Marxism" is the retard mutt word for the latest neoliberal feel-good ideology targeted toward upper middle-class faggots, so companies can just print the LGBT flag on their products to be "woke" instead of paying a decent wage to their employees.

>>15365075
>>15365586
>>15365650
>>15366220
>>15368060

>>15276017
>at the end of the day he was still a Marxist who wanted to overthrow Western Capitalism
Good.

>>15198407

>>14983841
>cultural marxism

>>14598984
>cultural marxism

>>14597913
>

>>14301825
science worshipers are so stupid. You really think the scientific method can be applied to anything and the result will be the same? You really think that economics is as concrete and predictable as anatomy? You think it can be free of teleology? Idiot. Go back to the fucking greeks. Learn you philosophy.

>>14253312

>>13608254
Holy fucking shit, are you living under a rock?

>>13222205
>it is another anti cultural-marxist using its criticisms of capitalism to criticize cultural marxism episode

>when you are so good that the Right have a love-hate relationship with you decades later

>>12961285
It is more likely that they wanted his criticism against capitalism but needed to dissociate said criticism from the marxism that Adorno was based on.

Adorno remains a very interesting figure to the Right. IIRC some Spenglerfags in this board like to claim him and one of his own too

>>12795571
Why refute it? Let it spill over into the schools and entertainment. Let the normies be filled with alienation. In the end, they'll beg us to save them.

>>12684836
Broke: Cultural marxism caused the degeneration of culture
Woke: Cultural marxists predicted and described the degeneration of culture via capitalism

>>12133155
>Also, the fact that the left-wingers are so mad that someone uses the term 'cultural Marxism' probably means they actually believe in it to some extent, and that Peterson should keep using it in order to make his opponents curse him, which gives them a bad face in Peterson's supporters' views.
More because people who rant about cultural marxism use the same exact arguments as them in critiquing modern society that they accuse said cultural marxists for creating

>>11865351
>tfw what he said back was repackaged back to reactionary criticism and was painted him as center of the same forces he was critiquing and the everybody on the right bought into it hook line and sinker

>>11765736

>>11650969
>capitalism has purposely brainwashed people into being retards to make money off them when its fairly obvious capitalism has simply exploited peoples natural inclination towards being retards.
Is there a big difference?

>>11576854
Well something about him must be right since everyone ITT likes to pretend he is one of them

>>11347349
You say that like it's a bad thing.

:'(