/lit/ - Literature

>>15205006
This is a terrible answer. It amounts to saying "God just ensured that we know what the scriptures are". Which does not bloody explain why the Catholic and Orthodox Churches, which are 1,500 years older than Protestantism, use a different canon from Protestantism. If the Holy Spirit just simply ensures that Christians know, then why do Christians disagree? Your forefather, St. Augustine, affirmed texts that Protestants reject as apocrypha. The story of the woman who married the 7 brothers, that is from the Book of Tobit, which you all reject. The Book of Sirach (Chapter 24) contains an indisputable prophecy of Jesus, and yet you reject that. If the Holy Spirit will ensure that Christians know, why do Christians manifestly not know?

>>14500397
>embrace tradition and reject modernism
Can you elaborate on this? What exactly is it that is right in tradition and wrong about modernism? (I don't disagree with you, but it is important that you understand why it is that tradition is good.)
>best version of The Bible?
RSV-CE2

>>14326552
shitposts aside, he really does