/lit/ - Literature

>>21573445

>>21262631
>The thing-in-itself manifesting as the subject doesn't repel the idea of lack
...because it, it just don't, ok?

>if the will to life is the thing-in-itself
There is no thing in itself when you make the claim about the will. The will-to-life is not the will, but a vector-defined will: vectors don't lack either. The thing is that you illiterate mongrels read philosophy as it was writen by USA brainrotten youtube-consoomer kids. It doesn't. Copenhauer must have been an incel and its whole philosophy is smeared by that (its compulsion with lack and its child trauma with suffering), but you insult is own intelligence and insight in abstract matters (which was real and undeniable).

>>20940165
>iTT: Characters that remind you of yourself?
Bobby, from Count Zero. (Mona Lisa Overdrive's Bobby was lame).