[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.4558348 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 769 KB, 900x900, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4558348

What does /lit/ currently think of free-will? I haven't seem a good ol' fashioned concept-focused philosophy thread in a whole and I think we should change that.

My current stance on free-will looks something like this:
1. If I perceive something reasonable to be real beyond any doubt, it is real.
2. I perceive that my actions are free in the sense that they are uncaused beyond any doubt.
3. Therefore, I have free-will based upon my free actions because of 1&2.

What think?

>> No.4317182 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 769 KB, 900x900, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4317182

I often read about good and bad prose here. However, im unsure if I really can grasp how to tell between the two. Could some anons post some examples of both good and bad prose so that I can begin to see the difference?

Unrelated pic

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]