/lit/ - Literature

>>18539409
>I saw quote posted around here once about how one becomes intelligent when they learn to appreciate less or something along those lines...
I ignore to what quote you are referring, but, regardless of that, it is rather a matter of what one appreciates, since, contrarily, appreciation of, and gratitude for, noble essence, intensifies in direct proportion to entelechial conversion —which, in turn, is inversely proportional to aging.

The sky is only as beautiful as the eyes are inspirited to vision it; there is always at least a part of the sky that fulfills one’s ambient request.

>>18393782
>who exactly can be considered an "aristocrat of the soul".
One who remains intact with one's nobility.

>Is it something you can become or realize you were all along, or are the people who fall into this category basically born this way and dont need an awakening.
Nobility is innate; in the world maintenance, and/or reconciliation, of it requires effort, just as propogation of love does.

As the body slows down the spirit must deepen wthin the mind, and the heart, in order to quicken the body; in this manner the older that one gets the deeper that one ingrains oneself within the ontic elements of the cross, natural spatiotemporal division/segmentation losing its significance in ascending order, in direct proportion to one's sublimative inclension.