/lit/ - Literature

I'm a high end salesman and have had negotiating roles in the past

I'm top of my state performance wise.

What specific questions do you fags have.

>>20813527
I don't give a fuck about the publishing industry, I read textbooks, classical literature, scholarly works, scientific papers, etc.

This whole thread is a waste of time. You could be reading and studying right now, but you choose instead to throw hissy fits about women, of all fucking things, reading literature that you personally deem beneath you. We could easily discuss some literature that is well, well beneath you, my freind.

Compared to me, you're a woman.

Women haven't had any selection pressure put on them as regards the employment of the faculty of thought, but hey, neither has your bloodline.

>>20792600
That's not true and you're stupid. A universe where good was monadic would be one in which good was all that existed, and only one kind of good.

Sounds like whatever that universe is it wouldn't have contact with ours in any way.

>>20792623
>You're defining them as categories relating to human experience.
Actually no, that would introduce a triadic logical structure into the architecture of reality. Big and small can still exist without conscious observation; it's size as an abstract concept in relation to that consciousness that ceases to be. Good and evil can exist in potential, just like planets and colors can exist in potential prior to their material instantiation. God is the realm of pure potentia.

You guys arguing that God is only what is good are just neo-platonists.