/lit/ - Literature

>>6856604
It's been a while since I read any of his stuff, but as I recall he justifies a nonsensical worldview with terrible history and insists on making his own silly names for everything, himself included. He has no actual understanding of the strengths, weaknesses and limitations of hierarchical control, preferring to justify advocacy for hierarchy with thematic nonreasons. More obviously, he has no actual understanding of why democracy has been massively successful, since he's blinkered himself into believing it hasn't been.