/lit/ - Literature

>>13957184
>Only need to sustain it long enough to drive competition in the ground.
There will always be competition.
>Totally possible without regulation.
How?
>No, my entire EXAMPLE relies on someone getting control of all the uranium.
Yes, I know. How would that happen? Unrealistic scenarios do not discredit an ideology.
>The ARGUMENT itself requires a company to get a hold of any necessary step in the product fabrication.
Again, how would that happen?
>>inb4 it's unrealistic because they'd need the funds to do it in the first place
That's an actual argument, address it. Naming monopolies supported by government subsidies, regulation, and intellectual property do not support the possibility of such a thing.
>there's nothing preventing 2 concurrent companies from striking a deal to get their own respective monopolies, like AMD and NVIDIA have done to each hold a virtual monopoly on different graphic cards ranges
Again, thanks to the government.
>>13957187
>The corporation will just undercut them to the point of losing money
They can't do that forever, and there will always be new competition.
>>13957214
>>he thinks small businesses have the means to produce for cheaper than large corporation
Yes, investors exist.
>>he thinks small businesses have the means to produce better quality products than large corporations
Yes, investors exist.
>>he thinks small militias stand a chance against corporation with access to better technology and highly trained combatants
How will a company figure out who is trying to fight back?