/lit/ - Literature

>>16465772
Yeah but I really won't. I have a strong 35 members now and actually regulate it: I ban that shit.
It's simply not a problem I face.

What is the most profound need of our era/age? What's the principle question we are failing to ask ourselves/we have yet to see?

>>15220704

i unironically run a fortune 500 company involved in advertising/marketing and am looking to get in touch with this man to see if he'd be interested in a job.

what you people don't seem to understand is 1. he understands bataille far more deeply than any of you shallow protoplasmic invertebrates; and 2. risk like that in today's age turns the right kind of heads. finally, something original and refreshing and actually portending to something like accuracy.

say what you will of him, but the acephalic, the heterogeneous, the fomenting, brimming, fiery dionysiac impulse--the overflowing excess of life upon life--i cannot say that our friend here doesn't "get it"--what he lacks is not understanding, but more eyes and eggs.

you all stand behind an age of disgusting sentimentality as though it were a shield, worshipping the lowest types of gods in the lowest types of manner; he is out there sucking the sweat off the neck of his.

so, if you are him, and you are reading this: there is potentially a 7 figure salary waiting for you if you're willing to drop a line.

>>15031500

why did you choose james for your pic?
why did you make this thread?

genuinely curious, many questions follow depending on your answers