/lit/ - Literature

>>5778392
Are you the same guy who wrote this:

>The problem is that you think that modern science is philosophy. It is philosophy, but it is very degraded philosophy that has a very unhealthy fetish for mathematics. Subatomic particles and blackholes are fairy tales, except fairy tales are often more edifying than subatomic particles and blackhole because they mention moral and aesthetic truths, whereas subatomic particles and blackhole are miserable conjectures. The thing with modern science is that they have an excessive hatred for ideas and an excessive love for mathematical demonstrations; which means that any shit idea can gain ascendancy if it's accompanied with enough mathematical witchery.

>Look at the concept of "matter" for example and see how the scientist's concept of it is quite dull and undeveloped.