/lit/ - Literature

>>16671035
I understand those claims, but i am even skeptical of my own existence. Meaning I don't even know if I am anything at all. I only believe what is true, because I know it is in front of me. However, I can't just deny the possibility that everything could possibly be meaningless and nothingness as well. Or it could be somethingness. Call me Schizo-Pilled, but I know for sure that it is possible I can both exist and not exist, I just don't have enough information to be sure if either are objective or are the case. So, I just believe whatever I want, whatever fact that i find valuable I latch onto it and believe it like a hammer. I make up my own virtues by pasting it together of masters in the past (philosophers). It is the only way I can think of a way to avoid the mind/body issue or the issue of existing or not existing.

I know that to be sure of ones own existence they have to believe it as the truest thing, but I am skeptical to even that.

Which means under your definitions that could be my version of an objective claim, but I am even unsure of my own claims. This goes for ad-infinitum. I have no clue if I am right or wrong.