[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.14457315 [View]
File: 22 KB, 335x499, 1553953510662.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14457315

>>14455891
No, he too is a victim of scientism, Heidegger is the answer.

>> No.14437667 [View]
File: 22 KB, 335x499, 1553953510662.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14437667

>>14437524
Yes, not only Heidegger but many of them would be impossible to firmly place in one of the categories. I do however think, as seems to be the consensus in this thread, that OP just made the picture to fit his conception of the left-right dichotomy of politics—which strikes me as sad.

>> No.14245336 [View]
File: 22 KB, 335x499, 1553953510662.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14245336

>>14241408
Eh, they've come to reasonable conclusions; but their rhetoric is pseud-tier. Just read Heidegger for all your anti-technicity needs.

>> No.12850301 [View]
File: 22 KB, 335x499, 41FLphx-MrL._SX333_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12850301

What did Heidegger and other continental philosophers see in Heracleitus? Is the idea of Parmenides being analytical the natural pendant to the love of Heracleitus?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]