/lit/ - Literature

>>22245083

>>21619304
It is quite funny that the brightest minds that ever existed acknowledge that it's more likely than not that God exists, or at least that there is a creator.

>>18793002
I had a sense that you would link to Bill Nye.
The fact that they are better equipped doesn't mean that they will succeed.
It means that if they had a genuine interest in philosophy then they could relate to it a lot more than simply a philosophical graduate. Many philosophers dwelled in sciences even because it wasn't until the 19th century that sciences divorced philosophy, they used to be the same thing.

Are there any books that show the life of elites?

>>18604916
depends on what you're trying to accomplish, if you like it then just read it

Which one of these Nobel prize winners has the best opinion on these philosophical arguments and who has the most retarded?

>>18041776
Science itself isn't "true", it's a constantly refining process used to uncover truths based in a material reality; and that process is still full of mistakes.
People who say they believe in Science (like you, you fucking faggot) use it to gain attention and have no respect for espistemology.

>>17896264
Not the guy, but I just found it

>>14721867
Science =/= scientism. Plus all of the major figures of scientism (DeGrasse Tyson, Bill Nye, Dawkins, etc.) all openly

>>14211483
Dawkins is a midwit or a shill trying to trap midwits in atheism away from Monism.

>>13482969
science is alright , normie popsci is cancer

>>12812320
This is just as true otherwise and even uglier in my opinion. Just look at a pop-scientist discuss philosophy, its cringe af.