/lit/ - Literature

>>20805554
peak larp then, there is no bindu in that Na, which is pic. related and this one here >>20790114
nor is there any upwards convexity

Holy based article, came to the exact conclusion that I made in this thread:
>Now it is up to the reader to recognize whether the source of Guénon's statement above, including the description of the form of the "na" and the corresponding numerical value 50, are to be recognized in the Archéomètreof the occultist author, or obediently accept the forced interpretation proposed by Masetto on the form of the Sanskrit 'na' that he himself exhibits. A shape that does not correspond at all to what he claims. I am well aware that those who have undergone a continuous work of persuasion will see that same 'na' with the distorting lenses that have been imposed on them. The unanimity of the pseudosufic crowd of Inner Science is a demonstration of this conditioning. However, even among the unfortunate who find themselves in such hands, there may well be someone who, observing the two images reproduced above, realizes the impossibility of such an interpretation. I also think that persisting in arrogant ignorance is a sign of a very impure mind. Especially when they accuse others of ignorance, who know much more both traditionally and academically. However, it is certainly not Masetto that he can give licenses of tradition to any teacher of which he knows nothing, when he has no objection about the indological teachings that Guénon received from prof. Sylvain Lévi. As for the meeting between the two traditions, considered infallible prophecy, it is a pure imagination that all the signs of the times deny and that no teacherHindu or Muslim has never even remotely conceived.

>And let this grotesque Turin farce end.

I was right, you were wrong according to this blog.

thankyou for the blog sir, seems I was not alone in detecting this absurdity.