/lit/ - Literature

>>16934796
You absolute fucking monkey; it has nothing do with magic; its is literally out convenience; nothing lasts forever, and currently the support structure is working as of now. It may change in the future depending on the peculiar circumstances ahead, and one may adapt. That is fine; that's what politics is about, retard, making deals and changing tactics depending on the context.
>You are an autistic teenager. I am not going to keep wasting my fucking time here.
Yeah, because you've demonstrated you can't argue with a clearly more intelligent and more educated opponent. Good to see you taking the L, and your absolute failure to actually contest or counter any of my arguments. At least you were smart enough to run away before I made you look even more stupid; which wasn't even that difficult to me because I destroy faggots like you all the time. Don't ever, in your life, think you can step toe to toe with me because you clearly can't and you never will.

>>16916464
He's the most liberating writer I've ever read in my life.
Stirner was a social critic who was a proponent of a specific kind of ethical egoism known as "Conscious Egoism" in which the individual is the measure of all things legally, morally and ethically, not abstractions, which calls phantasms, such as humanity, the state, and family. That these social institutions were ultimately a tyrannical hierarchy of ideas that subjugates owness to a collective organization. He argued for a conscious egoism in which the individual has full autonomy, and is conscious of every choice that they have - that the individual has the ability to reject all forms of authority besides their own.
Stiner resounding rejected all forms of societal organization from communism, liberalism, and theocracy for a union of egoists, an organization of conscious actors mutually coming together for their own interests
A union of egoists can be thought of an co-operative agreement between more than more than one party in which all actors willfully enter or exit on free agreement
The union of egoists, however, is not Stirner's "ought to be alternative" - it is merely a suggestion, ultimately could certainly reject such a union all together, or even see it as a temporary foundation for one's particular interests at a time.