/lit/ - Literature

>>14944500
so your saying that alchemy in itself is a futile and worthless endeavor, but it is how jung interprets and the elements that he adds to it that make it valuable? And that the elements and interpretations of Evola aren't worthwhile, because you personally deny his sciencism and materialism? A belief that I would share with you.
>>14944446
isn't it impossible to understand the work without the worker in mind? One cannot listen to bachs bwv 1001 sonata the same without knowing that it was written about his recently transpired wife. One can hear the grating of his teeth in the crunch of the violin.

>>11434963
>>11435772
That, and pic related.