/lit/ - Literature

>>17860594
Every second of every day with rapidly increasing intensity. With all seriousness, I wonder if anyone in the past 50 years was more right than Land about anything desu.

>'Techonomics' is a Google-strewn word of irresistible inevita-bility, repeatedly struggling to birth itself, within myriads of spellingmints. It only remains to regularize its usage. Quite different is a true neologism, but in order to designate modernity or capitalization in its utter purposive twistedness, it is now necessary to coin one-teleo- plexy. At once a deutero-teleology, repurposing purpose on purpose; an inverted teleology; and a self-reflexively complicated teleology; teleoplexy is also an emergent teleology (indistinguishable from natural-scientific 'teleonomy'); and a simulation of teleology-dissolving even super-teleological processes into fall-out from the topology of time. 'Like a speed or a temperature' any teleoplexy is an intensive magnitude, or non-uniform quantity, heterogenized by catastrophes. It is indistinguishable from intelligence. Accelerationism has eventually to measure it (or disintegrate trying).
>Land - Teleoplexy

I, I don't get it.

>>16763290
This

>>16539619
There's a lecture series ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d__In2PQS60 ) that delves into the first critique. I would not read the Prolegomena as >>16539632 said; it has a number of issues.
I read the Critique alongside these videos and feel pretty good in my understanding of Kant, even though I've only read a little of his work