/lit/ - Literature

>>6836581
No shit. It also sounds like you concur, now, that it's all (obviously) subjective. Or else I'm missing your point.

>without textual evidence, even
Do you want some quotes baby boy? I'm obviously basing my opinions on the first third holistically and I'm not prepared to give you about 200 pages of "evidence text".

>>6836607
Indeed. Truth be told I really just created this thread with the hopes of somebody pointing out to me Something I missed/am missing in my interpretation. As completely unprejudiced as I like to think I am towards reading etc. this is obviously not so easy if one is ignorant of said prejudices.

>>6836840
The main detective in particular or the various side characters? They all seemed rather two dimensional to me. Anything in specific you liked?

>>6836505
I've never been too fond of the deconstruction of cliches, stereotypes, tropes and the like. It's certainly better if the work tries to as original as possible. But I'm not all that familiar to these types of novels and as a result some of this in there might've been lost on me. As for "semiotics" I don't even know what it really means, seems like another way of expressing analogies (or their interpretation)?

>>6671243
>mfw only 65 privil-edge

>>6669347
But 3D is ew Anon.

The rest of what you said: Fair enough but if getting on a high horse and trying to lombast others for not playing the game is also considered as entertainment then the game needs some reformation I'd say.