/lit/ - Literature

>>21236665
>You are like a parody of a religious nut. What are you trying to say?
That you advocate the importance of evidence, yet when you 'rebut' my posts, you do not provide evidence, nor reasoning, for your rebuttal.
Do you presuppose there is no merit to religion? Do you presuppose that those who have felt "God" are simply just mad fools since you, yourself, have not seen or felt this in your subjective experience of this objective reality?
Ah, I've just noticed your timing of this post and how limited my time is to now respond. Bravo, asshole. Bravo.