/lit/ - Literature

>>7293968
Pretty sure you'll have a hard time backing up this correlation. I've never heard that the radicals complain would be a lack of waifu.

>>6976814
I agree.

A woman can only reasonably get 10 to 20 kids max in their life (world record is over 60, though), while a man can have thousands (Genghis Khan did). We have twice as many female than male ancestors, women choose, men try to stick out.

The resulting problem with
>women are inherently valued
(as opposed to nobody every caring to get in touch with basement dwelling guys)
and the traditional roles, as well as with biological preference,
is that women are dis proportionally valued only by their birth giving capacity and hence looks.

There is no outer incentive for a women to get on the team for solving quanutum gravitiy - an ugly women with a doctorate is not really more attractive than the ugly women without the mastery. Meanwhile, the ugly doctor/president women is not even more attractive than the hot cleaning lady.
Men don't expect monetary gain or more than sex+emotional warmth. A man (unless he happens to share the exact same trait as the ugly ass scientist entrepreneur whatever) will rather want to spend time with the young cleaning lady.
It's a (probably true) meme that feminists are ugly, but I mean the core value for their crying is valid. Women, even if they can get someone (they don't like) to fuck them whenever, have the shit card in society.

Educate me, /lit/:

Does it even make sense to read translated works when interesting at getting better with prose?
Of course, for story structure it makes sense, for example. But at which number of sentences or paragraphs does this end? Is tension build from sentence to sentence, idea to idea, or also within - or to what extent?

It's fascinating how straightforwardly downwards the quality of the show went, with each season.

The daughter and the fat agent also changed their character significantly, and not due to good development.