/lit/ - Literature

The pleasure an intellectual would receive from companionship and sex are lower than the insufferable frustration and boredom that inevitably follows after he spends more than 15 minutes with a person of regular intellectual capacity.

>>15025423
>women
>based
Pick 1

>>10266403
No, It's the 21st century where science has already established that women and men are different and not equally capable but you can go back to the middle ages believing false prophets (((feminists))).

I am surprised and disappointed you guys don't have those pictures saved.

>>8448293
Do you even do research or is everything you say based on nothing but what plebian logic has proven to run circles around those poor souls around you unfortunate enough to be a bit duller than you are?

>Your "hard data" is irrelevant, and you have done nothing to prove otherwise.
You have done nothing to prove it is irrelevant. You also do not seem to understand how arguments of this nature works: the burden of proof lies on the person making the claim. Prompted by your attempt to rebuke an antipated remark by predicting it, I asserted that very remark and provided evidence for it. You have claimed the data is irrelevant after failing to discredit it with logic that shows you lack knowledge of the subject matter. The burden is on you to provide empirical data that refutes my position. Otherwise you have no ground to stand on and should just keep quiet.

>You've implied a correlation--a crucial one--between specific IQ test scores and creativity in the arts, without the slightest evidence.
>"women are just so artistically and intellectually inferior"
>"social imbalances in the arts"
Never once was "_creativity_ in the arts" brought up by either one of us, so if anyone is making that implication, you are. I was talking about the relationship between gender and intelligence. However, now that you have brought it up: intelligence is linked to general creativity, which includes artistic creativity. Being intelligent also allows one to make better use of said creativity.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3682183/

>There is no more "natural selection" in the current marketplace than there is equality.
I wasn't talking about natural selection in the current marketplace, I was talking about the process of evolution via natural selection within the context of the 20 million years of early homonid and later human evolution. The fact that you didn't pick up on this clearly shows how lacking your understanding of this topic is.

>And I used the word "feel" advisedly.
And I made my remark about your usage of the word likewise.

(1/2)