/lit/ - Literature

>>18070797
>I've read that Dugin now decries Putin and says that he's just a materialist manager type
He did that several times,not really something new,he even describes him as ''Solar'' or ''Lunar'' sometimes.
He is still ''with Putin'' acording to himself.
>what are your views?
All I have in my manifesto folder is a picture of my cock and balls,just in case goverment niggers try spying
I see Putin as someone who only cares about himself,who has no intent to risk anything.
If Putin knew with 100% certainty that what he is doing will lead to Russia dying,and that the only way to save her was to become a radical and risk something as extreme as a civil war,Putin would rather let Russia die slowly,he would be content with Russia dying if he wouldn't have to face the consequences in his lifetime,I don't think he really cares about what's going to happen after he dies.
I know this is an extreme situation I invented,but I don't hold much hope in Putin.
Russia is also a extremely corrupt country,most of the time where we look good it's propaganda.
>I've never really read anything by him personally
>/lit/ - literature
>What would I get out of him rather than reading some more distinguished (both historically and academically) anti-democracy advocates? I'm thinking principally the German ones: Spengler, Schmitt, Junger etc, that type.
He takes clear inspiration from all 4 of them and a lot more (including Evola and Guenon,like it or not),and even namedops them.
That is something new,and I think he is very interesting for that.
The 4th Political Theory is one of his less detailed works,however he does mention other works of his in it,where he does go into deeper detail.
Look anon,I'm not really a ''Duginist'' even if it seems like it,I'm not here to defend everything this man has ever did,but I found him very interesting.