/lit/ - Literature

>>11743140
>>practices selective refutation himself
Where? If I did, I did not see it/

>That is an unfortunate ideological decision, reflecting these times
What times? It is a philosophical statement, you can find it in Hegel, or Buddhism.

>implying sexual attraction/fetishes are beauty
Could they function in mammals, without the affect of beauty? Seems to be, no.

>is with the observer not the subject.
The subject is the observer. Unless you meant to type object? Its not a problem, its a dependence.

But tell me, if someone experiences fecal matter as beautiful, and magically is relieved of this fetish, does the feces remain beautiful independently?

>I'm sure a fine specimen of homo erectus would indeed be beautiful also
I think you miss the point of the example,

>when we look back at our ancestors, most of us, would not find them beautiful. The *only* thing which has changed here, is the condition of the subject.