/lit/ - Literature

Has he ever had an original or effective or intelligent thought in his head? Yeah he understands what everyone says about Marxism and yeah he has a lot of opinions about things but I find it very hard to find anything concrete.

He seems to talk a lot about feelings, he feels like we shouldn't have to worry or want to be in control of a lot of things, he feels like capitalism will X and he feels like Marxishm ought to Y. Then follows some allegories and stories. But where are the arguments?

I hate Ted threads, you're all such pompous pricks. You guys are more dogmatic and closed to ideas than even left-wing university professors.

These kinds of things ought to be discussed, whether it's the flaws and solutions needed for modernity, hell even Rand's ideas on objectivism, post modern interpretations of reality, all kinds of ideas literature provokes and we can't discuss any of it because you guys spend more time shit posting than actually reading and thinking so you can participate in discussions with people that actually know the content. I know Marxists keep rambling about this, everyone claims to have read the Greeks, and Evola or fuck me if anyone tries to discuss Libertarians. Dickheads.

Is it universally preferable for mods to try and censor the greatest philosopher of our age?

Does he bring them more pain than pleasure with his unasailable ideas? Is the wisdom he brings to we /lit/izens universally preferable for the mods or is it preferable for them to supress the expansion of our minds.