/lit/ - Literature

>>10445325
tfw you see another pseudointellectual who just chose a comfy worldview so he won't have to challenge his limited intellect too much

>>7200116

>>7146661
>In my personal opinion, privacy is innately subjective to different personalities and people of different ethnic and social backgrounds

You should add that the truth is relative and that everybody is different.

>>6985592
>not everything has to be a literal representation of something god

>>6758350
>It's a important franchise
according to what standard?

>that inspired millions
to do what?

>mae J.K. billionaire
scamming people made Bernie Madoff billions. that make him worthwhile? that make his work worthwhile

9th grade - Psychology the first semester and Logic the second

10th grade - Ethics the first semester and Law the second

11th grade - Philosophy

12th grade - World and the Person which was basically teaching us about human rights conventions, and EU conventions and laws/

>>6583573
I read Egyptian papyri because I love the history of maths.
Step your game up.

>>6482394
>plot

>>6060631
no
no
no
no
no
yes
no

You are incorrect sir.

Also nice blog btw

>>5962593

>tfw grammar school master race

>>4859053
stop bastardizing Stirner you fucking goober, spooks are illusory self-imposed boogeymen hindering man from becoming an egoist.

Its not a code word for "everything I don't understand."

>>4783494


>Metaphysics denies the existence of reality.

if they denied reality how could they study metaphysics?

checkmate atheists.

>Nietzsche
>Hitchhiker's guide
>Harry Potter

>>4717704
Nietzsche should have stuck to poetry, the kind of people that are easily swayed by big words and flowing prose with very little content and the same people that are going to be swayed by this post.

The truth is that Nietzsche had no original thought was so ever. Everything of value that he said was already said and much better.

>Once it was clear enough that God doesn't exist
When exactly did it become clear that God does not exist? How and why? What do people know in Nietzsche's time that they didn't know 300 hundred years ago or now that would make any difference in the existence or non-existence of God?

>The only true answer to nihilism is either ultimate life negation - kill yourself - or create that central axiom yourself, BECOMING the new central arbiter of your existence and life yourself - Ultimate life affirmation - hence the Ubermenschen

Creating a set of values ex nihilo is as futile as worshiping a supposedly non-existent deity. Why? This is the very definition of the slave morality that Nietzsche spoke against. My ghostly master is dead, I better invent another one that shares my characteristics.

>It can't be stressed enough that Nietzsche changed EVERYTHING.
he changed absolutely nothing, Stirner and Kierkegaard outdid him in every way, he was simply their messenger.