/lit/ - Literature

>>13184032
Come get woke

Jean de la Fontaine
Racine
Stendhal
pic related

>>12245433
Here's why (ty google translate)

"Since time is in fact circular, it is not in the past that the present must be measured with in order to prepare for the future, it is by the extreme of the future (the concept of what is ideally to be realized) which is also the origin of the past, which thereby assumes the past only by revising it.
When the present is decadent (and such is the sad condition of our times), it is natural that we tend, in the reactionary mode, to return to the past, because illness is a corruption of a health that is presupposed; reaction is opposed to progressivism, which dreams of an infinite linear movement designating a necessary progress when compared to the past. But the reactionary spirit opposes progressivism only by adopting the same postulate, namely the linear conception of time ("it was always better before"), and as such it is the partner in crime of progressivism. To return to the past to ward off the catastrophe of a future potentially contained in a decadent present would re-engage the process of giving birth to this present decay. The proper method of promoting real progress, then, is not to return to the past as a paradigm - thus to a past that needs to be made present again - but to return to the past in a critical perspective, namely to make present only what was timeless within the past, and to what the past itself was inadequate (if it had been adequate for it, it would not have given birth to a decaying present), in order to promote a future which, at any distance from progressivism, is inscribed in the "telos" of a return to Origin (the concept of what has to be, first in intention and ultimate in execution), which, far from the reactionary spirit (sacralization of the past as past), is ablative of temporality itself and of the past. It is not because this shifting, collective, historical reality, which is France, has become aware of what it is meant to be only in and through its history, that its past history should be taken as the proper expression of his concept."

Realism.

Stop idolizing your subjectivity.

Become thomist. As for ideologies, antipersonnalist thomism combined with fascism. Unironically.

Ridicule. Benoist is a leftist and advocated for a masonic anti-white commie (Mélenchon) for the French elections.

Organicism (thomism + fascism + national-socialism) is the way to go.
Here are the main points :

1- The Charlemagne Institute believes in the metaphysical power of the natural reason
2- The CI is Catholic (therefore critical of Protestantism / criticism on the errors of sedevacantism and of some points in SSPX)
3- The CI is aware of the Jewish Question (revisionism / critical about the neopagan arguments against Christianity / critical about Judaism)
4- The CI is antizionist
5- The CI is nationalist
6-The CI ils anti-Brusselian-EU yet europeist
7- The CI is antidemocracy and mono-archist
8- The CI is anticapitalist, antiliberal and corporatist
9- The CI is ethno-differencialist / racist (following Aristotle and Aquinas)
10- The CI is for centralization, and critical about the principle of subsidiarity
11- The CI is antisurnaturalist
12- The CI is imperialist