/lit/ - Literature

What the fuck was his problem?

This entire thread feels like I'm reading discarded notes from an early draft of pic related

>>17955609
>he doesn't remember the solution of all philosophy
picrel

>>16869171
I think pic related may answer your question.

>>16685239

>You may not think that 5D thinking is revolutionary, but it is, certainly for the culture we live in today. And you may think that nothing was discovered that day, that choosing from one future or another is what every college applicant does. What is so unique about it? What is so unique about it is that it completely invalidates statistical analysis and standard mathematics when you go deeper into it like I did.

>Remember that masculine thinkers are great at making decisions about the future while accounting for the fact the future will have different rules from the present. 5D thinking is to understand that each decision you make in the present will affect the probabilities of the future. Or put another way, we can change the rules that the future will follow. We are not only choosing the future that we want to be part of, we are actively participating in the creation of that future. 5D thinking now compels us to attach action and thought together into one; we select the future that we want to strive towards. Once our choice has been made, the future we picked becomes more likely because we participate towards its creation.

>This completely makes statistical analysis impossible, because it introduces a strong layer of subjectivity or bias into the equations. The entire point of statistical analysis is that probabilities can be set in stone, and you can make decisions around these solid rules of what the future will bring. But what I propose is a future that is not decided by the
mathematicians or the business managers, but by people acting out that future. It places the population from a position of passive choice maker to active participant in their lives, and worse, there is no math to explain how they should make their decision. The future they choose is entirely up to them.

>Or is it? Is 5D thinking a sort of triumph of free will over determinism? It sure makes life impossible for the mathematicians to predict, but it's so unpredictable that it doesn't even feel like it's a system of logic. It feels like it's outside of science and closer to the dubious realm of moral philosophy. It's too separate from math and logic; it has to be thrown out! It's true that the technocratic elite of today would not want people to learn that they have free will, and that they do not need to think as linearly, as flatly, as we are all taught to think. But I went further than just preaching free will and a revolution against the algorithms that run out lives; I built a system of logic around 5D thinking, called 5D logic.


damn....

BUY MY BOOK YOU EFFEMINATE PIECES OF FUCKING GARBAGE

>>16046240
For me, it's the Synthesis of the Objective and the Subjective by Belcea.

>>16043090
Here's another book you might enjoy.

Well yes.

>>15985501
Yes

Horia Belcea loves everyone equally

Fiction is for women and children. Real man can put some effort in understanding the ideas that shape our world. I for one consider Horia Belcea to have achieved quite an impressive feat with his first book

Okay, who wants to discuss it for real

Is it true that it had a big influence on pic related?

>>15894982
You seem to have a similar capacity to the author of pic related for talking out of your ass about things you don't understand

Just finished pic related and was look for similar recommendations, thank you.

No read The Synthesis of the Objective and the Subjective