/lit/ - Literature

>>6346313
But if everybody is competing there won't be no way how can everybody win. Someone will have to lose. Even if I begin to improve myself today, I wouldn't be able to compete with someone who began 10 years ago, or someone who never had to make any effort because they were born alpha males.

Saying "lol step up your ass" is like asking a jobless guy during a time of structural unemployment to just make more effort into getting a job, ignoring the context, and the context of the post-sexual revolution market is of inevitable inequality and pauperization.

>>6241316
>Do you realize the mere notion of treating people's relationships with other people as an exchanging process that can be regulated marks you as a sociopath, don't you?

You only say that because deregulation benefits you.

>>4928391
Because forced redistribution of sex is the solution to the problem of sexual inequality raised by such shootings just like forced redistribution of wealth is the problem to economic inequality. But you are hypocrites that don't realize that because in the sexual market you are the winners and guys like Elliot are the losers.