/lit/ - Literature

I know big words, but I'm still dumb.

>>20816820
fuck you

>it's been 4 months since my master's dissertation has been made public and it has only been perused twice
How do I become a successful academic? Do I need to write a thesis on marxism or feminism?

they grew apart from overall board culture and declared independence from us, taking with them precious resources and user-value in violation of agreed terms

Learning to appreciate art with different political leanings than your own is an important part of being a normal human being.

The Human Development Index ranks quality of life according to life expectancy, education and per capita income.

The logic goes: "I can't become rich, but I may get to read more books than the billionaires and so by individualized HDI I can still a virtuous, glorious life". I am unlikely to become rich. I live in a country with Europe-tier healthcare and I've been managing my weight well. Would it be alright to spend my life on welfare just reading books, merely viewing careers opportunistically?

>>19354773
>How could one define a subject non-teleologically?

Teleology suggests Aristotelianism. From worldly affairs, it appears that God is no Aristotelian - rather than one grand narrative, God appears to be having one big nightmare at worst or a common dream at best.

"The subject is but another form, another spook in God's dream." The only telos there is that subject is just another illusion, akin to the anime girls that pop up in our dreams every now and then. The subject is just another form. There is nothing that guarantees a dream character will somehow flourish like an acorn into an oak tree.

So to the question, "How could one define a subject non-teleologically", the answer is "One defines a subject non-teleologically by denouncing Aristotle as just another spook and by entertaining the possibility, that God's mental forms likewise are just other meaningless spooks - God is a nihilist."

> The answer in summary "God the Object is a nihilist."

>>18674459
fuck you you worthless piece of shit dog motherfucker animal

No girl has ever flirted with me, approached or messaged me first, smiled at me suggestively or displayed any interest in me whatsoever. I am 29 years old.

What are some sites and communities where I can submit my own writing and have other users rate them?

>>17689444
>>17689467
Qu'est-ce?

I don't want to die without knowing the truth.
Have you found the truth, /lit/? What is it?

Why there is nothing rather than something?

I am Josef K.

>>17281630
the most explored subject in literature is romantic love
desu I think love is stupid bullshit of evolution which tricks brutes to carry on her sole task of grotesque reproduction
how many of the so called romantic partners would make a claim on their death beds that they will spend another life with their partner?
unfortunately not many.
things are even more hopeless when I observe "lovers" in my surrounding. sure I have no experience of a relationship but this what I have learned by observing people.
I have read quote somewhere which was like love's flame burn for one year and left it's ashes for 30.

What is the conclusion of this bros?
Not single new meme framework came out of this shitshow.

Thanks for the keks though.

Can’t believe there are so many people on /lit/ who moan about Mann being a pederast or Sade being a “degenerate” and so on and so on. Notice how the most depraved corners of the internet are always the most thoroughly infected with moralists! You will, without doubt, find the strongest outbursts of offended moral feeling on /d/ and /y/ and /aco/ and all the other boards and threads catering to savage and delinquent tastes. The man in the pornographic state of mind, the most subjective and dictatorial state of mind, wants to impose his own preferences upon others, whether they be sensual or aesthetic or political—sexual arousal engenders a rapacious intellect. Shotacons and lolicons are particularly guilty of this. They delude themselves into thinking that because they worship rarefied, hyper-idealised, non-threatening simulacra of innocence and cuteness that they actually value those things more than other people and, what’s more, they develop such unrealistic standards that their attitude toward things that fail to meet the mark becomes patently genocidal. The weeaboo would blot out all 3D life if he could. Now this might sound based, and it might be if it occurred on any conscious level, as a deliberately chosen evil. But the fact is that the typical resident of 4chan is unconsciously conditioned by the board culture to engage in a 24-hour doublethink that allows him to indulge in amorality and hedonism and cruelty and yet also to (completely self-seriously, without the faintest trace of irony) in the very same moment stand on his soapbox and lecture others about their degeneracy; to wail about how fags or trannies or libtards or poltards—or whatever transitory stimulus happens to be causing him (self-inflicted) psychic pain at the moment—are THE one ill responsible for the coming collapse of civilisation. It is a kind of ethical schizophrenia. And it is extremely annoying and extremely tiring. A clone army of immoral moralfags. Who could’ve thought! This is the real nihilist, this is the miserable species of future man Nietzsche warned us about. In terms of unscrupulousness, the conscious egoist cannot hope to surpass the hypocrite!—Of course, you say, this is just human nature. Yes, indeed, but never has it been so potent, so highly concentrated... a maximum of degeneracy and a maximum of Puritanism in the very same creature, duplicated thousands of times, churned out in their digital hundreds. Quite the achievement!

>>17196629
So he acted like a degenerate Med?
Do all of the "Retvrn To Tradition" asssholes want this?
I means if this is the case then by definition fags and noramalfags are way more "trad" in Greek tradition than tradcat larpers.

>>17129783
I don't even think about them

After reading the whole thread it is still not clear that what the fuck he actually believed in
Can someone sum up his shit?

What is the theoretical framework of 4chan?

>>17099586
Sorry mate this isn't impossible without a religion.
Or start working towards an artistic legacy. Create your immortality formula or meaning with exist outside of yourself and which is higher than yourself. You need a daddy and stick of that daddy is his ideology. You need a stick in your ass without it you're free and doomed.
You need to be fucked not doomed or gloomed.

>>17084239
Can’t believe there are so many people on /lit/ who moan about Mann being a pederast or Sade being a “degenerate” and so on and so on. Notice how the most depraved corners of the internet are always the most thoroughly infected with moralists! You will, without doubt, find the strongest outbursts of offended moral feeling on /d/ and /y/ and /aco/ and all the other boards and threads catering to savage and delinquent tastes. The man in the pornographic state of mind, the most subjective and dictatorial state of mind, wants to impose his own preferences upon others, whether they be sensual or aesthetic or political—sexual arousal engenders a rapacious intellect. Shotacons and lolicons are particularly guilty of this. They delude themselves into thinking that because they worship rarefied, hyper-idealised, non-threatening simulacra of innocence and cuteness that they actually value those things more than other people and, what’s more, they develop such unrealistic standards that their attitude toward things that fail to meet the mark becomes patently genocidal. The weeaboo would blot out all 3D life if he could. Now this might sound based, and it might be if it occurred on any conscious level, as a deliberately chosen evil. But the fact is that the typical resident of 4chan is unconsciously conditioned by the board culture to engage in a 24-hour doublethink that allows him to indulge in amorality and hedonism and cruelty and yet also to (completely self-seriously, without the faintest trace of irony) in the very same moment stand on his soapbox and lecture others about their degeneracy; to wail about how fags or trannies or libtards or poltards—or whatever transitory stimulus happens to be causing him (self-inflicted) psychic pain at the moment—are THE one ill responsible for the coming collapse of civilisation. It is a kind of ethical schizophrenia. And it is extremely annoying and extremely tiring. A clone army of immoral moralfags. Who could’ve thought! This is the real nihilist, this is the miserable species of future man Nietzsche warned us about. In terms of unscrupulousness, the conscious egoist cannot hope to surpass the hypocrite!—Of course, you say, this is just human nature. Yes, indeed, but never has it been so potent, so highly concentrated... a maximum of degeneracy and a maximum of Puritanism in the very same creature, duplicated thousands of times, churned out in their digital hundreds. Quite the achievement!

>>17085268
Pete BTFO'd Hackman.
That's the only thing I know about OOO.
I don't even what OOO is the abbreviation of.
Please don't give me (You)s.
Thank You.