[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.17381953 [View]
File: 286 KB, 500x441, sopranoposting.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17381953

>>17381716
I know you're in the thread dude. I'd like you to answer some questions if you don't mind
>how many copies did you sell before you started advertising?
>how many copies after?
>how many copies overall?
>did you shill anywhere else?
>do you think shilling on 4chan drew any negative attention?
I only ask because I'm writing a book (fantasy, not /lit/'s favorite) and would be willing to publish it on amazon for free (as well as a dirt cheap paperback) and am curious what your results have been.
To the other people in this thread, would you read a book you saw advertised on here? If the ads involved stupid shit like sneed and basedjaks, would that change your opinion?

>> No.16957879 [View]
File: 286 KB, 500x441, 1606841382697.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16957879

>>16952733
Since this is the Cyberpunk thread, and there's talk of all mediums, I might as well ask. Is GitS: SAC worth watching? Whatever anime I've tried, like Eva, Bebop, FMA03, Violet Evergarden, Memories, some movies, I've found them all "meh" at best. I've got some like the afformentioned GitS, LotGH, Ergo Proxy and some others to still go through, but I don't really feel compelled to do so. Will I get anything out of them or should I just delete them and don't look back? I'm not much into the style of it. I unironically enjoy MGS more for the story than
>muh wacky Japanezoo hoomor
I've consoooooomed a lot of series, movies, films and so on for the past few years, and I feel nothing after I'm done with them bar an emptiness and an embarassment that said time could've been spent n a skill or study, instead of a 70s B&W Hungarian drama...

>> No.16952080 [View]
File: 286 KB, 500x441, 1606841382697.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16952080

Bump.

>> No.16252599 [View]
File: 286 KB, 500x441, 1572224611713.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16252599

>>16252164
>overproduction of meat is objectively bad for the environment
>overconsumption of meat is objectively bad for your health
>despite this, 99% of vegans stop eating meat for purely moral reasons and attempt to justify their choice through flimsy moral arguments that hardly ever change anyone's mind
The vegan movement would be lightyears ahead of where it is now if its spokespeople simply said "stop eating mass-produced meat products filled with hormones with every single meal" rather than this "you monsters are hurting the wittle piggies :(((" crap.
Morality and whether animals are sentient or not shouldn't even enter into the argument.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]