/lit/ - Literature

>>4812373


this was my first reply to the thread anon (p.s. a strong instinct towards particularism and nepotism is also a factor in khazar success).

>>4776990


'we cannot know x' is a more contingent statement than the other, it is entirely possible that the referent may lack the ability to achieve alethea for a given thing.

>>4748258


theres also statistics that show that people who wear helmets are more likely to get head injuries, but these 'problems' are only problematic if one lacks an ounce of world formation capacity.

>Tables are like cobwebs, like the sieve of the Danaides; beautifully reticulated, orderly to look upon, but which will hold no conclusion. Tables are abstractions, and the object a most concrete one, so difficult to read the essence of. There are innumerable circumstances; and one circumstance left out may be the vital one on which all turned. Statistics is a science which ought to be honourable, the basis of many most important sciences; but it is not to be carried on by steam, this science, any more than others are; a wise head is requisite for carrying it on. Conclusive facts are inseparable from inconclusive except by a head that already understands and knows.

and what do we know? well you said it yourself after all, if all you know is each other, then sex would seem fine regardless right? i guess not even you thought you were right!

of course, what you *dont* seem to know is all the other things (like the effects of oxytocin resistance) that happen to be concomitant with an inveterate sexual lifestyle (aka, the cock carousel).

but hey, you dont have to take just my word for it either
http://socialpathology.. (blog-spot) .com/2012/03/promiscuity-data-guest-post.html
http://radishmag.wordpress.com/2014/02/14/pump-and-dump/#irrational

>>4733875


mah nigga