/lit/ - Literature

>>23279347
>I am the most racist man alive and I have met people of all races who I respect, cherish and love. This does not erode my preference to be surrounded by people with whom I share a common experience and understanding of the world, nor my wariness of people who are very different from me. This is the normal mode of human life.
You are making the point that I am trying to make. We all generalize. We all realize there are exceptions to our generalizations. We all realize that those generalizations are still, overwhelmingly, valid. 'Racism' assumes that every last member of a given race has the same, awful, qualities. That's just not so. But enough members of a particular race may be, in which case guarded, defensive, responses are appropriate, up to and including forced segregation.
>What is untenable is bourgeois, faggy 'scientific racism' and notions of absolute supremacy.
Scientific racism doesn't deserve to be put into quotes. There are genuinely scientific studies concerning the differences between races and those differences are real and important. Every scientific study of IQ differences for over a century shows that blacks, on average, are at least one and up to two or more standard deviations lower in IQ than whites. By comparison to the average white, the average black is borderline retarded, or worse. That matters, and, yes, it explains why Gorman's poetry is shit, why black 'scholars' are plagiarists, why black Supreme Court Justices don't know what a woman is. Just calling people like these fools and disliking them doesn't get us anywhere. Only by understanding--scientifically--why they are what they are and handling them accordingly can we arrive at a solution. And no, I don't mean a Final Solution. Just one in which blacks' inherent genetic debasement doesn't infect and debase white culture.