/lit/ - Literature

>>9976555

>>9071062

>congratulations cards
>shopping bag that says "cambridge"

Did you get accepted to Cambridge anon?

Okay, I'll try not to fuck up all the terminology because English is not my native language.
1) If not the Lolita book, no one ever could think about Nabokov as a paedophile. You don't need to be someone to write about them, that's what makes you a good writer. It's even more possible that he was gay due to his brother and two uncles: http://ru-antidogma.livejournal.com/708205.html
Just read some basic criminal sexology about being a paedophile. So he is just a great writer.
2) Now about the Humbert. Calling all paedophile are rapists is the same as calling all the men are rapists (insert SJW joke here). But he is a fucking egoist psycho. Remember that part where Humbert was talking to a school principal and she read to him Dolores' characteristics? She is totally fucked up in mind now. He was using her only as a sex doll. Peoples who call this book a "love story" are ignorant cunts.