[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.20415641 [View]
File: 70 KB, 850x444, Scotts-version-of-Goedels-ontological-argument-12.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20415641

>>20415634

>> No.20245908 [View]
File: 70 KB, 850x444, god1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20245908

How do "proofs of God" overcome the possibility of the intellect proceeding on hidden errors unrecognizable to itself?

>> No.20239629 [View]
File: 70 KB, 850x444, god.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20239629

>>20239610
that's easy

>> No.15232710 [View]
File: 70 KB, 850x444, Scotts-version-of-Goedels-ontological-argument-12.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15232710

>>15232685
Alright alright, even ignoring any particular organized religion, can you explain how it's reasonable to deny that God exists? It seems pretty inescapable that if you grant that a positive attribute exists, then a being with every positive attribute exists. Even the Greeks figured that one out. Godel's argument seems to be the best one at articulating it.

Every time I present these arguments to someone who denies that a god exists, they go full schizo and start denying that we can know any truth, or that math is entirely a human construction, or some other bizarre tirade.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]