[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.22841578 [View]
File: 8 KB, 179x281, images (23).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22841578

Haven't been here in years and recently decided to revisit after reading a few good (if niche) books, and putting in some good work on my own projects, in hopes of discussion and opinions. And I've gotta say..


Over half the posts here, and at least half the replies, are undoubtedly fake, at worst, or disingenuous at best. A fair percentage, then, beyond those are flamboyantly opinionated even though they are genuinely biased, jaded, oblivious, or just wrong. Leaving the few genuine, informed/informative, or "correct" posts and replies rare beacons of swamp gas to be easily confused as celestial phenomenon ready to be inexplicably followed and studied in disregard, and as separate, of the swamp beneath itself.

Even if you like it here, take more external steps to explore and share your literary curiosities and opinions. Even if you have to pay for it. Niche is only most fun for the masochists and scrutinists. If you have any choice at all, don't be either; at the very least otherwise, don't be here.

>> No.22816255 [View]
File: 8 KB, 179x281, images (23).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22816255

>>22816243
This might be one of the dumbest comments I've seen here in a while. I mean, its one thing to dismiss the book on popularity. But it's another to makeup a fake comparison to create irony grounded in, honestly delusion. I was going to say fallacy, but I don't think you actually get why you're dismissing it. I believe you're doing it to follow some image you've created that you believe follows an image you think you're following. Neet.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]