/lit/ - Literature

>>10151457
So basically I get your point, bud just don't becomes one of those drooling antisemites.
Chinese values are OK with racism, and that's cool, just keep it over there.
But racism in Europe and America? Nah B, those countries use diversity and immigration as their strengths, real shit y'hear?
So microaggressions are real. And the war on drugs and war on this or that... just stop being a butthurt libertarian and accept there's nothing you can do about it, it makes CASH, for the guys in charge that is.
No problem with this, just natural selection bro. What are you a spooked dumbass or something? What's with this "late capitalism"? You know that ideology doesn't exist and "capitalism" just describes what actually happens, and works, right? Try to make a real change in the world bub.

>This rejection of conventional forms of intellectual discussion is linked to Stirner's substantive views about language and rationality. His unusual style reflects a conviction that both language and rationality are human products which have come to constrain and oppress their creators. Stirner maintains that accepted meanings and traditional standards of argumentation are underpinned by a conception of truth as a privileged realm beyond individual control. As a result, individuals who accept this conception are abandoning a potential area of creative self-expression in favour of adopting a subordinate role as servants of truth. In stark contrast, Stirner insists that the only legitimate restriction on the form of our language, or on the structure of our arguments, is that they should serve our individual ends. It is the frequent failure of ordinary meanings and standard forms of argument to satisfy his interpretation of this criterion which underpins Stirner's remorselessly idiosyncratic style.

>>9804285

lmao woah spook ahahahaha

infinite jest