/lit/ - Literature

>>7210141
Like who knows, man. You were fuck'd up when ye wrote it. Why would any1 take it supr srs now? Ya blew it. Don't like Van Halen? Sheesh. What are u rly looking for? Are ye a good writer? Can ye churn out genius when fug'd up? Ya kno the answer, friend. Hunter S. Thompson work'd very hard learning to write and perfect his style before he went off the rails.

I am seriously suggesting that you study The Sense of Style by Steven Pinker. THEN get fuck'd up and post yr stuff and we will prob be impressed.

Specifically, the tangly prose is only OK if you have something to say. Um, what's the word? emergent? don't go for the symbolism will emerge from my spit-up gag. If ye really need to do that, learn to write crystal clear sentences. There's no reason to work thru yr gibberish when it's also empty. Srsly, read the recommended and ye can clear out the foxholes of humanity's unconscious w/yr S Class wit flamethrower.

Also don't tell ppl ye were fug'd up when ye wrote something.

>>6861697
It's important to balance what you want to convey with clarity. Whether you read him or not, you tripped my Burroughs wire and that's always a bad thing because yr not him, he's dead with (now) junk addicted worms slithering in and out of his skull.

But yr right, this should be about you:

When I closed my eyes to think about the quality of yr ¶s—I saw one word:

Poopfingers

I don't know what it means. But maybe you do. (Sounds gross!)