/lit/ - Literature

>>23397979
>>23398029
I would like to personally thank you for demonstrating the intellectual and moral bankruptcy of Buddhism.

> For you to value non-existent, delusional things is to value nothing, it is nihilistic.
If I think that there's an antique vase in my attic worth $1,000,000 and it turns out not to be there, it doesn't mean that I "value nothing" at $1,000,000. It just means that I'm wrong. You're making a very stupid argument. Nihilism can't be accidental. You're butchering that word. Are you ESL, by any chance?

> The Christian denies the world for heaven, so how is that not "worship of the void" as I believe you called it; that was to be avoided and denounced as demonic, yes?
This would be for the obvious reason that Heaven is not a void. There's a bunch of guys and stuff up there. Again, it doesn't matter if you don't think that's true: Christians who authenticity and honestly believe this to be the case are not nihilistic. I cannot emphasize enough how stupid this whole word game is.

Verification not required.

>>23268426
I actually don't know what normalfags talk about and haven't meaningfully interacted with them in probably 4+ years. What do they talk about these days?

>>23265433
> Retarded, chicks hook up with poor chads and regularly cuck rich ugly dudes
You seem to have overlooked the word "net" next to "status-physical-exclucivity", my friend. You've also missed the part where I explained that status is valued on an animal level as an expression of power-virility. If the poor guy has a higher NET value, meaning the multiplied value of all three qualities that comprise the axis and thus is percieved to have higher virility (which can obviously come from physical and other personality traits), the woman will be more attracted to him. Notice that you said "ugly rich dudes". My point was about how on a purely animal women go for whoever they percieve to be the top of the virility hierarchy.

>>23265443
I'm certainly not gonna argue. I've spent way too much of my life identifying with people based on sexual habits rather than the aesthetics that undergird them, anyhow.