/lit/ - Literature

>>12250833
Obligatory pasta, mama mia!

A decent short summary / intro to D&G:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EHnrE3j9kg [Embed]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lajsoQJ0V6A [Embed]

A lot of the stuff here:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4CtHPqv6eKr8pYqe8qEoEA/videos?disable_polymer=1

Everything by Manuel DeLanda:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=manuel+delanda

A bit more on the Nietzsche-Deleuze relation through Klossowski (who dedicated his book about Nietzsche to Deleuze):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7l7ZAKZZZU [Embed]

More on the Deleuze-Nietzsche relation (the entire series is fascinating if you're into Nietzsche):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFFxnf92XqY [Embed]


The Deleuze for the Desperate series:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GS35vUMhww4 [Embed]

Derrida's lecture about Deleuze (mistitled, it's about Stupidity not Forgiveness):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_r-gr3ccik [Embed]

There's probably a lot more, there are Vimeo videos as well which don't feature on Youtube.

Pirate Deleuze's Abecedaire (it should have English subtitles) as I can't find it streamed in full online anywhere.

His essay and interview collections (in no particular order): Dialogues, Negotiations, Desert Islands, Two Regimes of Madness, Essays Critical and Clinical. "Letter to a Harsh Critic" in Negotiations is short (about 7 pages) and tells you how to read his texts. As for the books, start with Nietzsche and Philosophy (read the intro to the English translation by Michael Hardt even if you don't read the book in English). Deleuze's courses are also pretty accessible and translated in several languages: https://www.webdeleuze.com/


A decent bibliography:
https://immanentterrain.wordpress.com/biblio/

>>12222991
>Deleuze philosophy is autonomous legislation, the creation of the superior forms of what is; it is not speculative comprehension

Fair, but is that enough to make him a Kantian? For Kant the form of the law was pretty much constant even if the contents had to be determined. It's not really a categorical imperative if you can come up with your own rules for it to the point of making its universality worthless.

>it is not speculative comprehension
Maybe, but there are some elements both of comprehension and of speculation there, you make it sound like he denies all knowledge and all realism.

>>12222998
Could you elaborate a bit? I haven't read much Brassier, but intuitively Deleuze is closer to some kind of metaphysical realism than to correlationism (in which most of the philosophical tradition fits).

Goat.