/lit/ - Literature

Removing the 'bad' from the good is also the dissolving of the expression of the lesser back to the greater source of all, ending your instance of the cycle back to Brahman while all the others who had failed to do so will have to be born into this world again and again perpetually damned until they eventually one day have the means to know Buddha Dhamma in one of their recent aggregate incarnations. There is avijja and vijja, but only the truth is in vijja, something that cannot be directly known from below but understood from above, removing all that is not the Self to come to know the true Self. Any non-dualism has to admit to using and recognizing some level of apparent dualism in order to reject it, which that rejection is ideal monism going against the false self of physicalism which is not Brahman. The composite psycho-physical being comprised of the soul expressed through the aggregates dies with the aggregate yet the soul removed from the psyche that craves the vices of this material world through vijja destroys the avijja of the psyche, negating self identity to the heaps which on turn is the self identity to Brahman. The whole two Brahman thing is just the state of Brahman in avijja or vijja from an inside perspective of the knower looking down on evil ignorance or from the outside perspective of the fool looking up from the state of avijja unable to see vijja. Semantic bickering among you fools that think there is no true Self is as laughable as seeing the antithesis to this in the belief that there is a false self. There is the true Self and there is no false/non-self. Only those who understands this are a true arahant, reject the notion of the false self to be true, as well as the notion of the true Self to be false.

>>11077919
>Is it Sexism or Antisemitism?

Both are part of the same story so really cannot be separated or judged independently.

ITT:Too many pretentious faux patricians believing in a false dichotomy