/lit/ - Literature

WHY READ OTHERS' JEWISH HOLOCAUST STORIES WHEN YOU COULD WRITE YOUR OWN?

BUDDHISM IS A NIHILISTIC, DEMONISTIC CULT THAT HAS BEEN BEING PROMOTED IN AMERICA, AND EUROPA, BY «PROTESTANTS», FOR, AT MINIMVM, SIX DECADES, IN AN ANTICHRISTIAN EFFORT TO UNDERMINE CATHOLICISM.

>>19532758


REALITY:

BRITISHERS: «I WILL DIE FOR POWER»; FRENCHES: «I WILL SURRENDER»; UNITEDSTATIANS: «I WILL DIE FOR ISRAEL»; RUSSIANS: «IF I DIE, I DIE».

ANTINATALISM IS ANTILIFE; ANTILIFE IS PRODEATH; ANTINATALISM IS KRYPTOSATANISM.

>>19235151
>Is Shakespeare the profoundest poet of all time?


YES; HE IS ABYSMAL.

BELIEF WITHOUT REASON IS CREDULITY; FAITH WITHOUT REASON: DELUSION.

>>19122433


1. FREEMASONRY WAS FOUNDED IN YEAR SEVENTEEN HUNDRED SEVENTEEN: A CENTURY AFTER THE FIRST PUBLICATION OF THE JAMES BIBLE.

2. THE MORPHOLOGICAL MUTATION OF: «IESV» TO: «JESUS», WAS A GRADUAL LINGUISTICAL PROGRESSION, THE SPECIES OF WHICH OCCURS IN ALL LANGUAGES; IN SPANISH, FOR EXAMPLE, LATIN: «IESV», HAS BECOME: «JESÚS»; THERE IS NOTHING HERETICAL ABOUT THIS.

3. ATTACKING HERETICS WITH FALLACIOUS ARGUMENTS IS COUNTERPRODUCTIVE.

>>18748719


1. WHOM ARE YOU CITING?

2. IT RATHER SEEMS THAT «CULTURALISTS» THEMSELVES IGNORE WHAT «CULTURE» IS, NOT BEING ABLE TO DEFINE IT, AND RESORT TO MERELY DESCRIBE IT AS AN EMPTY VESSEL INTO WHICH THEY POUR ALL AMBITS OF HUMAN ACTIVITY: A NOTION (NOT EVEN A CONCEPT) AS RIDICULOUS & VAGUE AS THE «MAP» ATTACHED TO THE INITIAL POST OF THIS THREAD.

«MAGICAL REALISM» IS A SPURIOUS, VAGUE TERM FABRICATED BY GERMANIC CRITICS, AND POPULARIZED BY ANGLOIDS, THAT REFERS TO LITERARY NARRATIVE FICTION THAT PRESENTS POETICAL ELEMENTS THAT ARE HYPERREALISTIC, AND/OR SUPRANATURALISTIC, INTEGRATED WITHIN A REALISTIC NARRATIVE, WHICH TYPE OF NARRATIVE FICTION IS WIDESPREAD IN HISPANOAMERICA.

THIS TYPE OF FICTION IS ERRONEOUSLY TERMED: «MAGICAL REALISM», BECAUSE, TO THE ANGLOID, AND GERMANIC, MINDSETS NARRATIVE FICTION THAT IS RATIONALISTIC & REALISTIC WITHOUT BEING KITSCHY SCHLOCK, AND POETICALLY ECCENTRIC WITHOUT BEING CENTRIFUGAL TRASH, OR TOPICALLY WHIMSICAL WITHOUT BEING GENRE DRIVEL, IS VIRTUALLY INCONCEIVABLE, AND A THING OF MARVEL, THEREFORE THEY REDUCED IT TO THE NOTION OF «MAGIC» IN A FUTILE ATTEMPT TO DESCRIBE IT, CLASSIFY IT, AND UNDERSTAND IT.

>>18253501
>Pure nonsense...

NOT REALLY.


>… firstly, a great amount of the romantics were christians: think about coleridge...

«PROTESTANT», NOT CHRISTIAN.

>… young...

WHO?


>… de quincey...

«PROTESTANT», NOT CHRISTIAN.


>… blake...

«PROTESTANT», NOT CHRISTIAN.


>… wordsworth...

«PROTESTANT», NOT CHRISTIAN.


>… chateubriand...

APOSTATE.


>… victor hugo...

APOSTATE.


>think about lyrical ballads - a revolt against...

HAHA.


>…[THE BREAKING DOWN OF] the mannered and stately classicism, poetry about common people, using common language...

ALL THAT WAS DONE, AND PERFECTED, BY (HISPANICAL) BAROQUISM; WHAT ROMANTICISM DID WAS KITSCHY IMITATION.


>… introspective...

MORE LIKE MORBIDLY SUBJECTIVISTIC, AND PATHOLOGICALLY PSYCHOLOGISTIC.


>…spiritual:

MORE LIKE GODLESSLY LOST, AND AGNOSTICALLY GRASPING AT GHOSTS.


>… is this not analogous to the victory of christianity over paganism?

ROMANTICISM WAS A PHLEGMATIC SYMPTOM OF THE DECAY OF CHRISTIANITY, WHICH STARTED WITH ILLUSTRISM; ILLUSTRISM REVIVED PAGANISM, AND ROMANTICISM REFASHIONED IT.


>…and does not it accord perfectly with christian morality?

NO; CONTRARILY: IT DISCORDS WITH IT.


>in fact everything about romanticism seems intensely christian...

EVERYTHING ABOUT ROMANTICISM IS AGNOSTICAL.


>… the idea that it is somehow naturalistic or godless is an incredibly strange and unorthodox one

NOT REALLY; YOU ARE, EITHER: IGNORANT, OR INTELLECTUALLY DEFICIENT.

OPEN MINDED, EMPTY HEADED.

>>18128358
>Most classics seem to come from United States, England, France, Germany, and Russia.


...

IT SEEMS SO TO YOU, BECAUSE YOU ARE IGNORANT, AND WITH YOU ARE MILLIONS OF OTHERS, BUT, ACTUALLY, MOST LITERARY CLASSICS ORIGINATE FROM THE GRÆCOROMANSPHERE, AND FROM THE HISPANOSPHERE.

>>18107965


«PURPLE PROSE» IS VERBOSITY; BAROQUISTIC PROSE ENTAILS SYNTACTICAL, AND CONCEPTUAL, COMPLEXITY, AS WELL AS COMMUNICATIVE EFFICIENCY, AND POETICAL VALUE; MERE VERBOSITY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE BAROQUISM.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS: «LATINOAMERICAN LITERATURE»; YOU MEAN: «HISPANOAMERICAN LITERATURE».

HOLA.

NO ESPERES; ESPERA NADA.