/lit/ - Literature

>denies choice of life
>presupposes a utilitarian model of ethics, has no response to ethical egoism
>assumes life is universally, inherently bad
>often depends on a double standard which posits non-existence as being good because it has no pain, whereas the lack of pleasure is somehow neither good nor bad
>ignores any possibility of a future utopia that makes past suffering worth it
>is hardly an issue, since even antinatalists themselves do not value non-existence that much, considering they haven’t killed themselves yet
>hypocritically attacks natalists by referencing biological urges to reproduce, not realizing that they are also influenced by their biology
yeah, I’m thinking it’s cringe

Examination of the Anti Natalist Book:
Better to have never been


I will not surrender

This south-afrikaner brainlet believes that you should not reproduce and that you should kys, because life is painfull.
So genocide is not a bad thing after all.