/lit/ - Literature

>>12607561
What if the laws of physics are innumerable and for whatever reason, each time I defy a law, I enter a coherent reality within the multiverse and am not even able to find my way back to the other reality because this one has a history of those rules already being in place? To me, we can believe we can know what we can know, but we cannot know the totality of the reality we are within, nor whether or not the laws have changed for us because we have changed with that law defying, law making. Maybe then, this multiverse we inhabit has rules itself and is not infinite at all but is itself like all organic creatures, striving for unity and purpose. The way we enter and exit these realities is itself unknowable due to the nature of reality itself as one and multiple. I am pretty sure there is no difference between the multiplicity of the earth and the nature of the difference between the subatomic and the atomic. The epistemic regimes having multiple applications for conceptualizing reality is ridiculous but can be shown to be possible.

>>12462240
I know this semantics, but it is important to note that to be afraid of death is stupid because it would actually be the point of release after being tortured.

t. torturer

>>12306702
Literally above the masses in that regard. But then he is a serious man not looking for much in his press. His sincerity is at least not so polished that you believe he spends all his days in some disdaining attitude towards the fickle people he has to work with to get things done. He does somehow not seem to have lost his babyfat.

>>12063220
no.