/lit/ - Literature

>>17251277
People legitimately believe that a 1900 year old book written by a bunch of different people is not only the correct morality, but the very source of morality.
>Accounts of Jesus are all second hand
>Many letters of Paul are written by schizos pretending to be Paul
>The apocrypha being conveniently left out despite at face value being as valid as the rest
>translated and assembled by people much later after these event unfolded
>God changing his mind for the lulz
And that's not even getting into all of the morally detestable takes the Bible has.