/lit/ - Literature

>>18675314
>Does Nietzsche have a prescription to all of this?

YES

AMOR FATI

>>17962571

>>17374277
>Beauty
If I wanted to see beef jerky, I would go to a sandwich stall lol. Acquaint yourself with real art.

I need books about the biography of a renaissance artist.
Michelangelo Raphael leonardo titian tintoret... its ok if not italian (and post bio of none renaissance artist for the fun)

>>15863266
And yet it was a natalist who begat these childless geniuses. Without this abominable act, perpetrated by these "mundane irrelevants," we wouldn't have your vaunted, precious, childless "geniuses."

>>15863307
What is a spook, and why should I care?

>>15863326
This but insert "Well at least I'm not a stupid breeder causing needless suffering" at the end.

>>15862468
His seminal undertaking, SOS, is so broad as to encompass everything one would ever encounter in his life. His philosophical framework is the world around us; I agree with you, and I recant.

Often times i realize, in retrospective, that i have been in another realm of consciousness so to speak.

Even though one is aware of his surroundings, one is nit invested in it and there seems to be nothing beyond the words in your head.

It is alike a dream im which your body knows the position of existance however your consciousness does not realize.

Neither does it care. The only important things is the present and so is it while reading.

While i am reading i do not feel like i am meditating, i do not care. However, after i am done i realize that it was meditative.

Does this state of consciousness of that have a name? Have you experienced it.

I feel like it is similar to the polarization of awareness that Montessori wrote about

>Humanity...All of my suffering on this world has been at the hands of humanity, particularly women

Fifteen seconds guidance is internal, twelve, eleven, ten, nine
Ignition sequence start. six, five, four, three, two, one, zero
Because he started with experiments in the backyard, Jack Parsons
As a little boy he already went a bit too far
But the trouble really started when he found another young arsonist
Because together they were ready to reach the stars
(Reach the stars)
So the two began to play around with abscess process
Jack is calling from a a local powder company
(Company)
Then the day began to really ... Rocket scientist
Thought that both would do what no one else had achieved
How high
(How high)
Does your rocket fly?
(Does your Rocket fly)
Better be careful boys
You just might
(You just might)
Set the world on fire
(On fire)
Better be careful boys set the world on fire
So Jack became a loyal follower of Mr, Aleister Crowley
He took an oath to be a Magister Templi
His pretty house in Pasadena was notorious for the orgies
Every night Abyssinian mysteries
(Mysteries)
Then his company became the famous JP Laboratories
His reputation made it difficult to proceed
(Difficult to proceed)
And at their home there was a chemical magical ceremony
They found his body in an pile of blood and debris
How high
(How high)
Does your rocket fly?
(Does your Rocket fly)
Better be careful boys
You just might
(You just might)
Set the world on fire
(On fire)
Better be careful boys set the world on fire
How high
(How high)
Does your rocket fly?
(Does your Rocket fly)
Better be careful boys
You just might
(You just might)
Set the world on fire
(On fire)
Better be careful boys set the world on fire
Do what thy will
Do what thy will
Do what thy will
Do what thy will
Love is the law
Love is the law
Love is the law
Love is the law
Fly me to the moon
Fly me to the moon
Fly me to the moon
Fly me to the moon

Okay, so i read the chapters about anselmos and lotario and do not know what to make out of it.

Is it again a relation of idealist and realist? I feel like literario becomes and realist and anselmos an idealist throughout the storie. Another thing was that Literio spoke of the dangers of testing someones moral "level". He said that it is like testing a diamond. Guy X has a Diamond and other people say that it is a great diamond. But Guy X wants to really know if it is infact a diamond, so he smashes it. If it stays the same way, it does not get more valueable but if it does get smashed, his whole he is fucked. I think, that there is a fall of the ignorant idealist here, the winner is always the realist, because idealists embrace beauty and "tugend" way to much. Infact, more than there is.

But what about adams apple?

God tested them aswell, but was he smashed by that, or did he face consequences? Obviously no, he is god, why would he face anything beyond him. So then, is this testing really amoral? I think not.

The reason why i think that Lotario and Anselmos changed worldviews is, because in the beginnig Lotario makes up all these ideas about why the testing is shit, and comes to the conclusion that Anselmos should not force him to partake. But he, however changed his opinion rsther quickly when Anselmos reduced all these ideas to "it is just testing bro".

Later on, after the case in the bedroom, Anselmos was captured by the ideal woman, who was his wife. Lotario however seemed to see things clearly since he had everything in mind. (The plan with Anselmos wife).

Anselmos, who became an Idealist, killed himself when he faced the truth, and Lotario, who know became a realist, may have been with Camila in the end.

Sorry for my turboautism if this is bad, these were just immature ideas while reading.

I just want to be rid of my sins anon

What is humanity?