/lit/ - Literature

>>8925240
We know that Capitalism and no government don't go hand in hand as you need a government to close the free-market loop to keep it from breaking which means that there is no system left to supplement Anarchism with today.
We also know that Socialism needs a government, thus Anarchism is a theory without an economic system to support its claims.

It requires relativism to function and the destruction of ethnocentrism. Often the people who are against ethnocentrism and the intervention in another society's moralty and the idea that one culture is superior over the other create an objective standard with a moral code with no right or wrong. This is unreasonable because it is self-destructive to remove all senses of right and wrong, it rejects the legitimacy and credibility of relativism because when you hold the moral doctrine of relativism consistently it will erase relativism itself instead of creating a moral philosophy that promotes being free of right and wrong.
They also have no grounds to tell other people what is right or wrong or how to treat other societies as they themselves cannot define what it means to form a culture or society, are cults a society, what about two people forming a strict moral code? To reduce moral issues to personal taste is the destruction of philosophy, if it were a simple matter of personal attitude then two people with conflicting views would not have conflicting views at all. But since moral views cause conflict moral arguments matter and must be discussed, we cannot simply argue that there is no conflict at all.
Beyond that I can imagine that it would not be a very productive society as people would have no guidance or direction and people are not rational beings and will not consume, accumulate or behave rationally all the time. A lot of people sacrifice long term for short term and people are emotional beings, letting themselves be guided by emotions, clear expectations and guidance will then steer a society to better productivity and reduce the amount of irrational behavior. Since total equality is not achievable as humans are not equal, the people at the bottom will be forced to be even more irrational, law will then discourage this irrational vigilantism but not in an anarchist society. I then think other forms of coercion will most likely fill the gap that will not be as rational and will most likely lead to an attempt to form a strong centralized government like the Communists in Catalonia were trying to do.

2/3