/lit/ - Literature

>>22448636
>>22448681
There is nothing in the quran stating that the books themselves are corrupted.
quran 4.47 demolishes any notion that the Bible was corrupted.
If there has been a corruption it would have occurred after the death of muhammad. By the 7th century there were thousands of copies of the Bible all over the Christian world and it would have been literally impossible to corrupt the Bible. As a matter of fact we know that several heretics attempted to corrupt the Orthodox Christian Dogma and they all failed.
Sadly for you muhammad also followed the heresies our Holy Church managed to defeat. For example muhammad rebranded Docetism and Gnosticism as islam.
We know there has been zero corruption in the Bible apart from minor scribal errors. Nothing as serious as the Sanaa Manuscript.
The quran has been corrupted to such a degree that corruption itself has become canon via the introduction of the ahruf and qiraat. Corruption of the quran was so rampant that the muslims accepted it into their dogma as intentional.
To top it off, the idiots who wrote the quran realized at some point that it is extremely nonsensical and self-contradictory and thus came up with verse 3.7 which states "...and no one knows the quran's [true] interpretation except Allah..."
So, here we have a book that is supposedly guidance and light for humanity, and at the same part of that book [which part exactly we do not know] is by design impossible to understand.
In other words part of the quran is absolutely useless to us and we will miss nothing if we were to throw it away.
I say we throw away the whole thing. It;s nothing more than a badly written plagiarized collection of old tales and myths.