/lit/ - Literature

>>18784667
is that you?

I unironically think Pol Pot was based. He turned urbanites into fertilizer, he emptied the cities, he abolished classes on the first day of the regime, he abolished money, abolished religion and other products of bourgeois individualism. He refuted Marx through his super great leap forward.

The genocide was a hoax though

>>14700213
>pol pot
Pol Pot did nothing wrong. The Cambodian “genocide” is faker than the Holocaust and Pol Pot actually brought his country closer to communism than any other state socialist nightmare

>emptied the parasitical cities and settled 95-97% of the population on collective farms
>distributed according to need
>abolished money
>abolished classes
>abolished religion
>humbled the urbanites and made them work the land, using them as fertilizer in the rice paddies when they weren’t fit enough
>expelled foreign elements from Kampuchea
B-BUT MUH POOR CAPITALISTS, MUH POOOOR VIETNAMESE, MUH POOR BUDDHIST MONKS, MUH POOR LON NOL SOLDIERS WAHHH